Raquel Figueiredo.
← Back to work Case Study 03 — IoT · Telecom · Conversational AI

Vivo

Connecting customer experience, IoT support, and internal operations for Vivo's Smart Home ecosystem — one thread among four products I shipped inside Vivo's design system.

Role
Senior Product Designer
Timeline
6 months, discovery to production
Products
Smart Home app, support platform, IoT service journey
Design system
Vivo's system, maintained by DesignOps
400+screens & scenario states
6 modiscovery to production
~20%reported lift in purchase interest*
Liveecosystem remains active

Business context

Vivo offered connected-home products but lacked a dedicated support platform and specialized service team. Smart-home customers were routed through tools and analysts built for other Vivo services — fragmenting diagnosis, installation, and support into processes that weren't built for this product.

The challenge

System-level opportunity Design one connected experience across the consumer app, technician workflows, and internal support operations for a premium, technically demanding customer segment.

Discovery

Solution

Onboarding — from first open to first device

The consumer app's onboarding sets the tone for everything after it: a short value-proposition carousel, account creation, and a guided first-home setup — designed so a customer with zero technical confidence still ends up with a configured home in a few taps.

Onboarding screens shown above reflect the actual shipped flow.

Pairing — from empty state to an active, working camera

Pairing a physical device is where Smart Home onboarding usually loses people — Bluetooth permissions, Wi-Fi bands, serial numbers, and blinking lights are not concepts a first-time customer already has a mental model for. This flow walks a customer from an empty home through Bluetooth setup, device discovery, network selection, and plan activation, to a working camera.

1 — Getting started

2 — Identifying and connecting the device

3 — Setup in progress

4 — Naming, confirming, and activating the plan

5 — End state

Edge case — no matching Vivo plan

Not every customer scanning a device already has an eligible Vivo plan tied to their CPF. Two variants were designed for this dead end, differing in tone and the recovery action offered.

Key product decision

Not a screen-level call The most consequential decision wasn't a UI adjustment — it was treating Smart Home as a distinct service ecosystem that needed dedicated operational workflows, specialized support, and connected context across both the customer-facing and internal tools, rather than folding it into Vivo's existing support model.

Outcome

*Evidence note — the 20% figure and qualitative outcomes are reported project results provided from the experience; exact analytics definitions should be confirmed before public publication.

What I learned

Designing for a specialized market means understanding not only user behavior, but socioeconomic context, device cost, technical confidence, and the operational ecosystem required to sustain the experience after purchase.

Also at Vivo — Sirius

Sirius — the fiscal platform behind Vivo Telecom & Mercadoria

An internal B2B platform for issuing and correcting NFCom (telecom fiscal documents), tracking billing cycles, and managing rejections across Telecom and Mercadoria — the two business lines it serves. Real billing rows in this system run into the millions of reais per cycle; the design problem was making that density scannable for the finance and operations teams who live in it daily, on a foundation built on Mística, Telefónica's own design system. The file history shows continuous iteration across most of a year, with dedicated Design Review and QA passes.

Also at Vivo — Fibra Lite

Fibra Lite — a self-serve fiber subscription funnel

Catalog → coverage check → registration → installation scheduling → payment, with fraud detection running at two separate points in the funnel (TOPAZ at scheduling, KONDUTO at checkout). Built and handed off with the same rigor as a shipped e-commerce product: versioned handoff pages, a component library, QA-specific pages mirroring each flow, and full Tablet/Mobile responsive variants.

Also at Vivo — Aura

Aura — designing the conversation, not just the screen

Conversation design for Aura, Vivo's AI support assistant, across five decision tracks (repeat customers, fraud & scheduled visits, mass outages, sync issues, technician scheduling). Every path is versioned, validated against Content Ops, and reviewed on a monthly cadence with managers — the same production discipline as a shipped interface, applied to dialogue. This is the track record I'd point to for conversational and AI-assisted product design specifically.